< Previous 10 | 1-10 of 552 | Next 10>
Now Is the Time for Community Banks to Abandon Free Checking
ViewPoint Report:
Analyst Author:
Robert Hunt
| December 16, 2011
Increased demand for new services, restrictions on fees, added compliance costs, and a low interest rate environment are impacting bank profits. Although large US banks are implementing new checking account fees, community banks have maintained their free account policy. TowerGroup believes it is critical for community banks to implement checking fees both to restore profitability and avoid backlash from new customers. This ViewPoint highlights the need for community banks to implement fees on checking accounts and discusses how these fees can be implemented while minimizing customer attrition.
|
< Previous 10 | 1-10 of 552 | Next 10>
|
< Previous 5 | 1-5 of 2346 | Next 5>
< Previous 5 | 1-5 of 2346 | Next 5>
Document
Market Challenges and Business Opportunities in Data Management
Seventy-five percent of data management executives expect to number of data sources to increase exponentially. However, only 30% of IT business leaders believe they have the capabilities needed to manage this growth.
On Thursday, November 3rd, TowerGroup brought together executives in the Capital Markets and Investment industry to discuss challenges and solutions to improve data management. This session gave executives the opportunity to discuss strategies for optimizing the cost of sourcing financial data, increasing the quality of data, and reducing data integration risk.

TowerGroup Live (Recording)
Managing New Standards and Market Volatility with Actuarial Technology (PDF 722 Kb)
Presented by: Sam Stuckal With new reserving standards on the horizon and a growing policy base, insurers need to respond with mature processes and sound technology investments in actuarial systems. Our review of actuarial reserving systems will help you automate actuarial processes to drive the risk management of your business in today's challenging environment.

TowerGroup Live (Recording)
Mobile Technology and the Wealth Management Client (PDF 690 Kb)
Presented by: Darrin Courtney The adoption of smartphone and tablet mobile devices to access the Internet has exploded in the last few years. According to a recent survey, 35% of US adults own a smartphone, and of those owners, 84% access the Internet and 37% check their bank account balance. However, a recent survey we completed of HNW clients shows that mobile technology in wealth management is still in its relative infancy, as no more than 2% of clients use a mobile device to interact with their firm or had information presented to them by an advisor using a tablet computer. This webinar shows members how best to formulate mobile technology strategies by:
- Evaluating the use of the mobile channel by clients for interacting with their wealth manager
- Comparing the impact of tablet computing, mobile access, and real-time monitoring on client and advisor behavior
TowerGroup Live (Recording)
Six Pillars of Innovation in Data Management (PDF 1603 Kb)
Presented by: Gert Raeves The management of data in financial services is a perennial challenge. Acquiring the data is expensive, and the quality of the data is often uncertain. In 2011 alone, financial institutions will incur expenditures in excess of $24 billion on data and data management. At the same time, data drives every trading and investment decision, is transmitted along the service chain, and is the root cause of many risk and liability mitigation challenges for both the sender and receiver of data. This webinar demonstrates how to prepare for transformative changes in the data management space over the next three to five years by:
- Investing in technology innovation to improve data quality
- Focusing on cost containment to reduce the time-to-benefit
- Understanding how data democracy creates opportunities for service providers
Document
Evaluating Vendor Candidates (PDF 75 Kb)
Firms often give vendors in-depth instructions to make up for their fear of a poorly executed project. This approach is counterproductive and results in increased costs to the firm. Not only does the firm waste time and effort preparing these detailed project requirements, but the process also fails to leverage a vendor’s innovative ideas. Leading firms have instituted a standardized process for presenting project requirements to vendors and evaluating these potential vendors. This limits the miscommunication between vendors and the firm and standardizes the evaluation process. A unified evaluation process ensures that the firm selects the right vendor to complete the project.

|